3/14/12

she's almost here.

The Waking

BY THEODORE ROETHKE
I wake to sleep, and take my waking slow.   
I feel my fate in what I cannot fear.   
I learn by going where I have to go.

We think by feeling. What is there to know?   
I hear my being dance from ear to ear.   
I wake to sleep, and take my waking slow.

Of those so close beside me, which are you?   
God bless the Ground!   I shall walk softly there,   
And learn by going where I have to go.

Light takes the Tree; but who can tell us how?   
The lowly worm climbs up a winding stair;   
I wake to sleep, and take my waking slow.

Great Nature has another thing to do   
To you and me; so take the lively air,   
And, lovely, learn by going where to go.

This shaking keeps me steady. I should know.   
What falls away is always. And is near.   
I wake to sleep, and take my waking slow.   
I learn by going where I have to go.
Theodore Roethke, “The Waking” from Collected Poems of Theodore Roethke.







I feel my fate in what I cannot fear.   I learn by going where I have to go.

3/5/12

we need equality, kinda now


It was suggested to me, recently, that I should not be upset about racist comments from my church, because, and I think this may shock some of you, I am not black. I am not black, and (SPOILER ALERT) I am not a man. So while it is good that I stand up for things that seem wrong, (Really? Oh. Good.) I should focus on the things that apply to me, and not look for excuses to condemn the church.


I reject that idea on so many levels,  and it makes me really upset.

1. I reject the idea that anyone who advocates for change is just "looking for an excuse to condemn the church." To vilify our motives, my motives, with the assumption that people like me just want to cause problems? Unacceptable. Racism is the problem, and racism condemns us as false Christians. Pointing it out? Common human decency. 

I want the church to stop being racist because racism is wrong. I want them to recognize the wrongness, because it is the first step to making sure it never happens again. I'm also not a Jew, but the phrase "Then they came for me," rings in my head. 

First they came for the Socialists, and I did not speak out --
Because I was not a Socialist.
Then they came for the Trade Unionists, and I did not speak out --
Because I was not a Trade Unionist.
Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out --
Because I was not a Jew.
Then they came for me -- and there was no one left to speak for me.
-Martin Niemoeller

2. If we tell ourselves that we cannot be upset by things that do not directly concern us we our denying ourselves  of what I believe is the primary purpose of our existence: To gain empathy. To alleviate the pain of our fellow humans, not only the humans that are like us, but the humans who are not like us. Jesus said it best: Love one another.

For the Mormons in the audience, Alma says it too: Mourn with those that mourn, even when we aren't black. Comfort those who stand in need of comfort, even when you are not directly hurt.  (Mosiah 18:9)

It is why we are here. You can believe it is why God put us on earth, or you can accept it as just the right thing to do, but it doesn't change the fundamental truth: Learning to love and accept one another is why we are here.  Sometimes we fail, and we hurt each other, but we must be willing to try again, however imperfectly.


3. But there is a Black man who said some pretty great things about our need to confront not only racism, but injustice and inequality as a whole: "Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere." Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. knew that the Civil Rights Movement wasn't just for Black people, it was for human people.

James Zwerg knew that too. James Zwerg participated in the Freedom Rides from Washington D.C. to Birmingham. At one point, he was the only white passenger. In Montgomery, the bus was attacked. Zwerg was one of the first people who stepped off the bus, allowing others a chance to escape. His attackers used his suitcase to bash his skull, then pinned him down and proceeded to knock out his teeth, while spectators stood on the sidelines. One man stood by and watched the beating, carrying his little girl on his shoulders.





When asked about his experiences, Zwerg simply noted, "My faith was never so strong as during that time... I knew I was doing what I should be doing."


I've never been attacked for standing up for my beliefs. I've lived a comfortable and safe life because of people like James Zwerg. The very least I can do is say what should be obvious: Racism is wrong. I can't just stand by and watch.

4. Lastly, because racism is one piece in the ugly puzzle of injustice, I want to include a quote from Joss Whedon. Yes, he of Buffy the Vampire Slayer fame. In his speech for the "Equality Now" foundation, he responds in various ways to the question, So, why do you write these strong women characters?

"Because equality is not a concept. It’s not something we should be striving for. It’s a necessity. Equality is like gravity, we need it to stand on this earth as men and women, and the misogyny that is in every culture is not a true part of the human condition. It is life out of balance and that imbalance is sucking something out of the soul of every man and women who’s confronted with it. We need equality, kinda now.

So, why do you write these strong female characters?

Because you’re still asking me that question."

LINK



ASSORTED FLOTSAM AND JETSAM

*It was also inferred to me that white people are hypocrites for being mad at Professor Bott because black people aren't even upset at his comments. Apparently, someone has spoken to all the Black Mormons, and knows how all of them feel. I'm not even going to address this argument further, because it makes my brain hurt.


*Here is a  question I am not asking: Can you be a good and faithful Mormon and still reject racist "folk doctrines?" I'm not asking that question, nor have I ever, because the answer has always been "yes."  Despite comments to the contrary, I never implied that those who stay active in the LDS church, despite it's issues, are wrong. I respect the individuals that faced discrimination- black, white, male, female, and still stay in an attempt to make the world, and the church, a better place. We all have ways to combat injustice, from Jim Zwerg to the actively Mormon BYU students who protested Professor Bott's comments last week. I never said, nor believed otherwise.


3/2/12

My heart is in the coffin there with Caesar

This is another response to the Professor Bott/LDS Newsroom debacle. You've been warned:

Every once in a while, the cosmos blesses teacher with a wonderful student. These students make your day better simply by existing. They say “thank you” at the end of each day. Your heart leaps every time he or she raises their hand, because their comments consistently validate your belief that you are accomplishing something of worth. You remember that student for years.

For me, Sam is my student. I unabashedly love him in a way only English teachers can love a 17 year old boy. (That means I love him in a completely appropriate way with clear boundaries rooted in a desire for him to succeed academically.) I like that he thinks before raising his hand. I appreciate the way he incorporates his beliefs and thoughts into his reactions to the text. Sometimes he speaks in a way that makes me realize the characters in the novels are real to him. I suspect he genuinely cared about Huck Finn.

He cared about Huck Finn, and I've only seen the mild-mannered Sam remotely angry once: during our discussions on  racism and culture in Huck Finn. He was horrified by Tom’s unnecessarily cruel treatment of Jim. He couldn’t understand how Tom could treat Jim like a plaything, prolonging his slavery for the sake of “adventure.” Later, without any guidance from me, Sam pointed out the callousness of Huck’s answer when Huck makes up a story about a steamboat accident.  Aunt Sally asks if anyone was hurt, to which Huck remarks “No, just a n_______r.”

Maybe the racism in Huck Finn horrified Sam because, according to Brigham Young, he "wears the mark of Cain." But I think Sam’s horror stemmed at least in equal part from Sam’s sense of personal integrity. Sam is a good and kind person, and the truly good and kind tend to be horrified by little things like injustice.

I don’t even mind when Sam reads his scriptures during SSR (at the beginning of class, students are allowed to read a book of their choice for ten minutes,) even when he is behind on the assigned reading. I don’t mind, and despite some major cynicism towards the LDS church, I do wonder if that all that scripture reading helped create my kind a thoughtful student. My heart breaks a little thinking that, because it forces me to ask myself why it didn’t work for me? If Mormonism helped make Sam the kind of person who cares about the well-being of others, even fictional characters, why can’t it work for me?

I don’t know when Sam’s family joined the church. I wonder when his father received the priesthood, and if his grandfather died waiting. I wonder if my student who reads Preach My Gospel despite being two years away from serving a mission is familiar with our history of racism and discrimination. Does he know that the school he dreams of attending is named after a man who supported slavery because he believed Blacks were cursed? Is he aware that he may take a religion class from a teacher (Professor Bott) who promotes a “discriminatory” God, a God who withholds blessings because Blacks were “fence-sitters” in the pre-existence? I look at Sam’s heavily annotated triple combination and recoil at the idea of anyone telling this bright and thoughtful student that his testimony just isn’t enough, or wouldn’t have been enough 34 years ago. I think of Huck telling Aunt Sally that no one got hurt.

Of course, in light of the  Professor Bott’s comments, the LDS church is quick to remind us (via statement from the vague and mysterious newsroom,) that “It is not known precisely why, how, or when this restriction began in the Church but what is clear is that it ended decades ago. Some have attempted to explain the reason for this restriction but these attempts should be viewed as speculation and opinion, not doctrine.” Great. We don’t know why Sam’s testimony didn’t matter 34 for years ago, but it does now.

Of course I am pleased that the LDS church made a clear statement against Professor Bott’s statements: “We condemn racism, including any and all past racism by individuals both inside and outside the Church.” But I don’t know if a 196 word statement claiming only partial responsibility for generations of discrimination is enough. When Sam meets his first Mormon Bigot (because he will,) how will a “statement issued by the LDS Newsroom” fare against the words of a prophet like Brigham Young, or McConkie, or Kimball?

Like many LDS bloggers and writers, (Joanna Brooks, Jana Reiss,) I want more than a Newsroom statement. I want an apology, I want a sincere asking for forgiveness for the pain our practices caused, and will continue to cause if we allow racism to die a slowly anesthetized death from The Newsroom. I want a death blow issued by President Monson, over the pulpit, in Conference. I want something that Sam can hold onto when he serves his inevitable mission and someone incredulously asks him why he serves a church that barely recognizes their racist heritage.

I want it for Sam, but I’ll confess, I want it for me too. Someday my great-great grand-daughter may question why her ancestor stayed connected to a church that told her that her worth lies solely in being “the wife and mother of the children of a worthy holder of the priesthood,” (note that this implies that I am mother to his children, not ours,) while her husband receives not only the opportunity to be a parent, but the power to “speak in the name of God the Lord, even the Savior of the world.” When that day comes, I’m sincerely hoping that there is more than a Newsroom quote to calm her heart. I’m hoping that there will be more than benevolently sexist language about women being “worshipped” instead of being equal. I’m hoping that someday my grand-children, whatever their race or their gender, will be seen as truly equal to their white male counterparts.  

But what I’ve learned, not only from Sam, but from Professor Bott and The Newsroom, is to recognize that the tiny part of me that wants to make Mormonism work. I want it to work for me.  I want it to work for me on some level that I don’t understand.

 I’m just not sure it can. I’m not sure I can have a testimony of The Newsroom when my testimony of the gospel itself seems questionable. I don’t want to live like my ancestors, or Sam’s ancestors, waiting for the change and apology that may never arrive.  It is good that we are condemning racism, it is good that we see men and women as equal partners. But we need to apologize for racism, and we need to recognize that it is impossible to be equal when one person “presides” over the other.

 It is good. We are on the right track. But it is enough?




Links















2/16/12

announcements

I'm sharing a link to a podcast I did a few months ago with Mormon Expression:

The Delightful Ball of Feminist Fury, Stephanie Child Bride

I talk about blogging, reality TV, my kid, Gay Marriage and most importantly (for me, anyways) my faith journey. I listened to it last night, and it was like meeting myself for the first time. Mostly, I listened and thought "I did that. I survived all that."

Talking and writing about my faith has been incredibly hard, but immensely rewarding. Thanks to everyone who has walked this path with me, from Spouseman, to my mom, to random internet strangers, I've felt your love and support and it means the world.

Now go listen to me talk for an hour and a half. You know, if you want.

2/12/12

an individual already

A Newborn Girl at Passover
by Nan Cohen
Consider one apricot in a basket of them.
It is very much like all the other apricots--
an individual already, skin and seed.

Now think of this day.  One you will probably forget.
The next breath you take, a long drink of air.
Holiday or not, it doesn't matter.

A child is born and doesn't know what day it is.
The particular joy in my heart she cannot imagine.
The taste of apricots is in store for her.




She's almost here, (7 weeks is not a long time, in the mind of a pregnant woman.) When I worry about all the sadness she will inevitably feel, all the horrible, non-apricot things she will encounter, I like to remember all the wonderful things in store for her. She is an individual already, but I hope she someday enjoys the following things:

The first time she reads something so wonderful and beautiful, that it makes her cry. I hope she has a book or a poem that she can barely stand to share with someone else because it causes a throat lump and a scratchy voice.

The first warm day after a long winter.

The feeling of accomplishment after working hard for a goal.

The moment she realizes she has found the person she will love forever, and the knowledge that this person loves her back.

Really good cheese.

Sleeping in on Saturday.

Making out.

The first day of school (please bless that this child loves school.)

The last day of school (please bless that this child is sensible enough to realize the importance of summer.)

Sour candy.

Strawberries.

Tag at recess.


I keep hoping this is enough, in some small way, to make up for the things that keep me up at night. Unfairness, inequality, misunderstandings, mean people. I’m hoping her apricot moments are enough.




2/6/12

Television! (No Delete Monday) form.

I love television. I love all kinds of television. A list of what I am watching, what I am simply reading recaps of, and what I no longer watch but make other people watch so they can keep me apprised of goings on.


I Watch This

First, we should all understand that anything with the words "Fairy-Tale Adaptation" is like crack to me. Like crack, there are different types and degrees of quality, but I will partake and become addicted to ALL of them. Fairy-tale adaptations in the form of YA Literature? Yes please, let me expose my vein (Um, people shoot up with crack right? I know very little about drugs, despite being a DARE graduate.) Fairy-tale adaptations in movie form, especially terrible movie form? (See Little Red Riding Hood, and all of the "Snow White" movies coming out.) YES. Fairy-tales on TV where I can hulu them at my own convenience? HELL TO THE YES PLEASE. Suffice it to say I am watching Grimm and Once Upon a Time.

I think I like Grimm better. The acting is better, the story lines are more complex, and it is significantly darker. I does lack a little of that human relationship factor, but I'm cold and heartless so the minimal interaction between the protagonist (another thing about TV, I never learn the character names,) and his girlfriend/fiancee doesn't really bug me. I think the friendship between the protagonist (hereafter known as Cop Dude) and Wolf Guy is funny and endearing. I love bromances.

Once Upon a Time is good though, as well, although heavy on the human relationship factor, sort of light on plot (other than comparing/contrasting the traditional and modern versions of fairy-tales,) and probably isn't angsty enough for me. (Excuse me whilst I reapply my eyeliner, and push my dyed black bangs off my face.) If anything Once is a really pretty show, which appeals to those of us lacking in the human relationship department, and heavy in the ohhh look at the shiny thing department.

I also Watch

Downton Abbey: Because I am a white, female, former History Major and English Minor. Of course I watch and enjoy this. I also take quizzes online to determine which Jane Austen Character I am (formerly a Marianne from Sense and Sensibility, now Elizabeth from Pride and Prejudice.) I have engaged in heated debates over which film adaptation of Emma is better, and think Heathcliff is a dick. I'm a cliche, and fine with it. It doesn't hurt that Downton is a well-written and beautifully curated soap opera. It is funny how untrashy one feels watching a soap when everyone keeps their clothes on. Most of the time.

Side- note and sort of spoiler: William is adorable. I'm glad he's dead. I'm awful.

Vampire Diaries: It is funny how wonderfully trashy one feels watching a soap where nobody keeps their clothes on, and people are brutally murdered with no hint of consequence. I will love this show until I die, because it is the TV equivalent of a pop-tart. Pop-tarts are bad for you, but they make you feel so good. Also, Team Damon. If you insist on linking yourself with a morally deficient undead hottie, it might as well be the funny one. Chillax, Stefan.

Modern Family: Although, can I be honest, I'm questioning my devotion. I know.

How I Met Your Mother: Legen.....dary.


I Don't Watch This Anymore: But I read the Recaps Sometimes

The Bachelor:Meh. They will ride Helicopters. Someone has a boyfriend or girlfriend back home. After a few promising moments of scandal, the show will be mind-numbingly dull as a bunch of sort-of pretty people talk about "being open" and "here for the right reasons." Unless there is a huge douchebag that I can write about, who will help my blog accidentally skyrocket into quasi-fame, I have no interest. (PS: Thank you Bentley. I bought beautiful fabric with the ad money I made from writing about you. You are still a huge douchenozzle.)

Gossip Girl:  When the recaps are more entertaining than the show, you have a problem.

I Make Other People Watch This, and then Tell Me What Happened

Grey's Anatomy: I stopped when the hospital kept getting shot up/bombed/attacked and everyone kept going on as if nothing had happened. I mean, yes, they had PTSD for two episodes, until it happened again. Also, I am tired of Derek and Meredith being together or not together. PICK ANOTHER PLOT LINE TO MAINTAIN INTEREST, people! Sheesh. Also, I don't like it when non-themed shows try and get themes, like singing. That said, I like to be kept abreast of what is happening, every two months. Abreast. Bahahaha.

Actually, I haven't been updated on this show in a few weeks. What is going on?

I Hate This Show so Effing Much

Glee. I can't even.


Anyway, That is what I watch, sort of. What do you watch? Am I missing out on something fantastic? Is there yet another fairy-tale adaptation show I do not know about? Have you ever been as invested in another person's reproductive equipment as you are Matthew Crowley's? How bad do you hate Glee?

1/30/12

One Woman Can Change Anything. Many Women Can Change Everything

I’m so excited for my baby girl. I really am. The other day I bought her a little outfit with a kitten on the front, and it came with a tiny hat adorned with little cat ears, and I nearly died right then. Truly, I am very excited for a little girl.
I’m excited for my little girl for less superficial, and less gendered reasons as well. (Although, I’d put a little boy in that cat outfit too, rest assured.) I’m excited to share my favorite books and favorite movies with her. I’m excited to take her to my favorite places. Someday she’ll come home from school with little-kid pictures to hang on the fridge, where all the people look like big smiley spider blobs. Hurray for little girls, and little kids! (I never thought I’d type that. That is the miracle of life, right there.)
But someday, I want my little girl to grow up. If she’s 25 and still wearing hats with kitten ears on a day other than Halloween, (or unless she’s joined a revival cast of Cats,) I’m going to feel like a bit of a parenting failure.  
That seems obvious, right? Someday, little girls grow into women.
Not entirely. Lately I’ve noticed a trend, mostly in the form of celebrities and “lifestyle” blogs, in which the newest, hottest thing is to act like a little girl, but with breasts. Sometimes I call it the Zooey Deschanel  phenomenon. Adult women wearing frilly little dresses and lacey ankle socks, legs bowed like they just took their first steps in Mom’s high heels. Their voices are breathy, and their online profiles state “Hubby is a 2L in law school, but all I want is a hot pink swing set for the backyard!” In one particularly disturbing profile picture, the husband sat on a park bench, looking stern and grown-up in a suit and reading The Wall Street Journal. The wife sat on the other end, legs and mary-jane shoes in the air, blowing a big bubble-gum bubble.
Apparently I’m not the only one annoyed with the Zooey -Deschanel- little-girl phenomenon, and Zooey even addressed her critics by stating that “If you feel like dressing like a girl, there’s nothing wrong with that. I don’t know why femininity should be associated with weakness. Women should be free to express who they are without thinking, I need to act like a man, or I need to tone it down to be successful. That’s a very good way to keep women down.”
On many levels, I completely agree with Deschanel . I don’t think there is a right way to be a woman, and I’m not even opposed to occasional forays into sartorial whimsy (I have some ballet flats with bows, that’s girly, right?) I also don’t believe the solution to gender inequality is dressing like a man. For me, it isn’t so much the clothes, but the attitude behind them, the attitude, the posing, the refusal to talk about anything other than rainbows and butterflies.  It should be noted that the Deschanel  quote I used comes from an interview in which Deschanel poses by making wide-eyed kissy faces at the camera.
But Deschanel is absolutely right about this: Femininity shouldn’t be associated with weakness.  I think we simply disagree on what it means to be feminine. When I think of feminine, I absolutely think of strength. I think of my Grandmother who gave birth naturally to five children, one of whom was born feet first.  I think of First-Lady Obama, looking positively beautiful in a pink sheath dress, with arms so toned she could beat any of the Republican nominees in an arm wrestle. I think of Joan of Arc dying for her beliefs at 14. Joan of Arc should have been wearing ballet flats with bows on them, but she had bigger fish to fry.  I think of Mother Theresa, who crossed cultural, social, and political borders to help those who were truly weak.  Mother Theresa   didn’t need to make kissy faces at the camera to prove she was a woman, and neither should my daughter.
Likewise, I’m discouraged by all the positive praise the recent article, “The Death of Pretty” received. In the article, Pat Archbold claims to be sick of all the slutty “hot” women, and wants us to go back to being “pretty, and innocent.” First, oh look, a man telling women how to dress so that he can feel better! Revolutionary! No. Men, stop telling us what to do with our bodies because you don’t know how to handle yours. Women, stop telling Men it is okay to tell us what to do with our bodies.  I don’t want my little girl dressing like a prostitute, but I don’t want her to need to be “pretty” either.  She is worth so much more than her face.
Secondly, and more disturbing than the “pretty” comment, however, is the idea of women in perpetual “innocence.” Children are innocent. Yes, to be innocent means “free from guilt or sin,” but it comes at a price: to be innocent means “to be free from guilt or sin especially through lack of knowledge of evil.” I want my little girl to live a life free from guilt or sin, of course, but not at a sacrifice of knowledge. As she grows into adulthood, I want her to be knowledgeable, so that she can know evil, and fight it.  I want her to alleviate guilt from knowing how to make it better. To get all Biblical, Adam and Eve lost their innocence when they left the garden, but look at what they gained: the opportunity to become parents, knowledge of good and evil. Sex. Experience.  Life.  Even if you don’t believe in the literal story, the myth itself is intriguing: Would you rather remain a little girl, or grow into a woman?
Lastly, I will confess that I was inspired to finally publish this post after reading Alice Bradley’s post “On Being an Object, And then Not Being an Object.” In her post she shares this antidote:
“ A year ago I was at a family event and a few of my mom's friends--older women all--were expressing amazement that I would let my hair go gray. One of them--a woman I've known since I was born--said, "Men don't mind it when their hair goes gray, because gray hair makes you look more intimidating. And a woman doesn't want to look intimidating."
Alice Bradley’s response: “Do I want to look intimidating? God, yes. I do.”
So often women are told, sometimes openly, and sometimes in whispered mumbles of “Bitch,” that we must choose. We can be feminine and pretty and girly, which translates into nice, and lady-like, and good. Or we can be strong, aggressive, and accomplished, which must mean bitchy, rude, and ugly.
I refuse to accept that false dichotomy. I refuse it for myself, and I refuse it for my little girl. Baby, you are beautiful for so much more than your tiny, pretty, cat-hat head. You can be brave, lovely, wonderful, kind, confident, accomplished and strong. You can be a woman.



Links: